Following Radiohead

Radiohead hits back at Miley By Miley Cyrus and Thom Yorke (AP File/Sun Media File)

Celebrity Feuds


Radiohead has continued music’s oddest feud with Miley Cyrus after blasting her for threatening to “ruin” the band. Cyrus revealed she had made it her mission to “ruin” Radiohead after frontman Thom Yorke snubbed her at the Grammy Awards last month. The Hannah Montana star requested a meeting with her favourite band when she discovered their dressing room was four away from hers, but Yorke politely declined because he was preparing himself for his first performance at the music Oscars.

In a radio interview last week, Cyrus said, “My manager asked and said, you know, ‘Miley, she’s really obsessed and she’d really like to meet them,’ and they were like, ‘Yeah, we don’t really do that.'” Cyrus was left humiliated by the slight – because she had already boasted to her friends about meeting the band. She adds, “I left ’cause I was so upset. I wasn’t going to watch! I’d already texted all my friends, we were all freaking out.” And the teen sensation was so hurt she made an instant decision to expose Radiohead as mean guys – something that has annoyed Yorke.

In a statement issued to magazine Us Weekly, Radiohead’s publicist says, “When Miley grows up, she’ll learn not to have such a sense of entitlement.”



Now I don’t want to come off as a pretentious fan of Radiohead, who would feel that he has the right to claim who is worthy to listen to any given band. But this little side story to the Grammy’s is kind of hilarious on the surface. I mean can you really picture this teeny bopper sitting on her tour bus, listening to “knives out” or “I will” before a big sold-out concert in Disney World? But hey I could just be the loser making rash assumptions about the depth of this pop idol. The entitlement bit was funny on Radiohead’s part, but I suppose this behavior is to be expected by a 16 year old.

Although all kidding aside, a Rolling Stone cover featuring Thom and Miley would be some collector’s item.

How come the grammys end up where they started?

I thought Thom Yorke and Johnny Greenwood’s appearance at the Grammy’s, gave the whole night its really only raw musical presentation. Just Johnny and his vox, while Thom was free to roam and do his thing. (He looked closer to the Thom of the “Pablo Honey” era with all of the hair; minus it being blonde) The USC marching band must have caught everyone off guard, as it added a lighter air to the often “dark, moody” vibe the band receives in general.


It was funny in the lead up to the Grammy’s being aired or really even during the show, for about the first hour and a half there wasn’t even a mention of Radiohead performing? It was really only about 15 mins. before they went on that they were said to be coming up. In a way it’s kind of amusing how they played the awards show, considering their means of distribution for “in rainbows.” The Grammy’s are clearly all about the big label acts, as they try ever so desperately to milk whatever they can out of Mccartney die-hards and whoever is still left from the Kidrock crowd of the 90s. (and he’s in his Gospel phase now?) Plus their new Michael Jackson in Kayne West – glove and all

The Grammy’s are really about honoring the established pop acts that support their crumbling industry. John Mayer, Justin Timberlake, Kenny Chesney, Stevie Wonder, Neil Diamond, what use to be of Whitney Houston, and I guess Jamie Foxx?

Don’t get me wrong, Radiohead is very mainstream in the main scheme of things. Even the fact that they decided to play was kind of interesting considering how anti-big music/awards/interviews they’ve been for so long. Maybe that’s what I love about the band. They constantly skirt the line between approaching music independently, appearing on movie soundtracks, appearing at awards shows, and recently dropping their ties with a major label in Capitol.

It’s all so entertaining.

Album of the year


Radiohead’s In Rainbows has been nominated for “Album of the Year” in the year’s Grammy Awards.

Here’s who they are up against:

Coldplay – Viva La Vida Or Death And All His Friends
Lil Wayne – Tha Carter III
Ne-Yo – Year Of The Gentleman
Robert Plant & Alison Krauss – Raising Sand
Radiohead – In Rainbows


I am biased in who should win album of the year, being an avid Radiohead fan for the last 8 years or so. But consider the precedent the band set in late ’07 in giving it away/demanding fans to set the cost they deemed worthy. Radiohead is clearly at a stage where money takes the backseat to questioning the whole record institution outright. It speaks to how music is becoming more of a blog accessory, movie trailer add on, and background ad. device in general. I think the opportunities for bands to showcase their music is ever expanding, it’s just finding the hot niche market or creating a marketable promotion tool like Radiohead has. The record industry was always about putting out the next best single from an established artist on the radio then waiting for huge “record” sales to come in. But the “record” is quickly being replaced by the flavorful “single of the week”. So in order for “In Rainbows” to be viable as a record, Radiohead must have seen this as a no brainer.

Not to mention the striped down/universal appeal (research the song “knives out” and you’ll understand their own production standards) the album sustains from start to finish. Just today I read an article about how Joe Satriani is suing over Coldplay’s song “viva la vida” for plagarism. This doesn’t surprise me, especially considering how on their last album they admitted to ripping off a Kraftwerk melody note for note.

The British Boys and Mens clubs.